Peterson Foundation Statement on Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal

NEW YORK — Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, commented today on the announced infrastructure deal between the White House and a bipartisan group of Senators. Peterson said:
“Bipartisanship is important, and so is our $28 trillion national debt. Working across the aisle to address important needs of our nation is an essential component of a functioning democracy. However, fiscal sustainability is also critical for our future economy, so we must ensure that these investments are fully paid for.
“There are significant questions about whether the funding mechanisms in this proposal will truly cover the cost of the spending. Lawmakers should continue to work together to develop pay fors that are legitimate and credible, in order to achieve the necessary cost savings to offset the cost of the bill.
“It’s very refreshing to see our lawmakers successfully come together, especially on tough decisions about how to pay for priorities. But we are already on pace to add $13 trillion in debt over the next 10 years, so the least lawmakers can do for the next generation is to not increase the rate of digging. If we care enough about our future to make these investments, we should also care about reducing the high and rising burden of debt and interest costs that cast a shadow over our economic outlook. Making these investments while also addressing our fiscal challenges is truly the best way to improve the opportunities for the next generation.”
# # #
Further Reading
The Six Largest Corporate Tax Expenditures
Relative to the size of the economy, the U.S. collects less revenues than many other advanced countries. Tax expenditures are a contributing reason.
What’s the Difference Between the Trade Deficit and Budget Deficit?
The terms “budget deficit” and “trade deficit” can be conflated, but they are distinct measurements of important fiscal and economic concepts.
Understanding the New Senior Deduction in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
The senior deduction adds complexity to the tax code, and fewer than half of seniors will benefit from it.